The New York Times reports:
For a crime to be considered terrorism, the government must prove that the perpetrator intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a unit of government or affect the conduct of a unit of government.
Prosecutors can use criminal charges both as a means to punish people for what they have done and as a way to deter other people from similar acts in the future.
But applying terrorism charges to a case in which prosecutors believe the broader target was a specific industry, rather than the government or the public at large, is unusual.
Read the full article.
Mangione’s Attorney: He was on display for everyone to see in the biggest staged perp walk I’ve ever seen in my career. What was the mayor doing at this press conference.. the mayor should know more than anyone about the presumption of innocence that he, too, is afforded when he… pic.twitter.com/CerCRk1aXp
— Acyn (@Acyn) December 23, 2024